CRITIQUE CHALLENGE (ANIMATION)

        

        

              I was choose one animated movie , the tittle is Hambuster.Hambuster tell the story of what happens when our food rebels against us. The story also tell about  the burger monster was eat all people around the town .The beginning of the story is a man but a burger and want to eat a burger .When he want to eat the burger, the burger want to eat him back.In the story have a own message to tell to the audience whos watching this movie.This movie is very awesome and when audience watch the film, there can feel many feelings such as scary and disgusting. The movie also messed up.The animation here is fantastic,and the director wear their the influences on their sleeves,even going so far as to some great, B-movie homages in the credits.The story is simple enough,one could almost say well-worn, but the team is talented and well versed enough in the tropes of over the top horror or comedy to do is justice.The diner scene,in particular,is a highlight,featuring a wonderful attention to facial expression and a absurd amount of viscous  red fluid.At the very least,it holds the distinction of being one of the few film featuring a protagonist in the possession of multiple,swaying chins. .Massage of the story is don't like to eat fast food because fast food can make a many disease for example obesity.In the film massage success delivered to audience.

        

           In my objecticvism opinion, the chosen animation for this aesthetic evaluation is Hambuster . One criterion has been set based on objecticlism, for i.e audience should be able to finish watching the animation from the beginning to the end voluntarily leisure time.when audience watch the movie they must feel scary and disgusting when they see how burger want to eat all people around the town.The story achieve to audience because massage in this movie success to people understand .Audience sure feel not patient to waiting other scene in this movie .This movie tell to audience for not eat a fast food always because fast food not good for our health. Its proof when a burger eat back people who want eat a burger. The animation also very interesting and make audience feel scary to eat fast food .

          For aesthetic evaluation, i think we have to conduct from objecticvism and not from subjecticvism,emotivism and relativism because objecticvism is suitable criteria to make an evaluation.I would to argue with people who say objecticvism is not true than relativism because objecticvism always grounded in reality and belief in moral truth.Relativism more to compare the movie and not see from the public opinion.In my opinion,the animation suites everybody even in a different background but firstly they should free their mind from logical thinking and set the purpose to watch it is just for having fun and to be entertained.

          So,as a conclusion is the criteria of objecticvism is modt suitable in maing aesthetic evaluation better than other criteria for example subjecticvism,relativism, and emotovism although it is also can be acceptable

in main aesthetic evaluation.